Documents and Contracts
Documents and Contracts
Business Documents and Contracts
Legal Documents and Contracts
Historical Documents and Contracts
Documents
Social Aspects of Documents
Functional Characteristics
Classical Roles and Workflows in Document Production
Document Production Technology
Document Life Cycle Management Technology
The Document Economy
Future of Documents
Science and Technological Documents
News Clips and Other Related Documents
UN Documentation Centre
Contract
Contractual Formation
Contractual Terms
Setting Aside The Contract
Remedies For Breach of Contract
Contractual Theory
Contractual Clauses
Design by Contract
Implicit Contract
Employment Contracts
Home » Implicit Contracts
 

Implicit Contracts

An implicit contract in a broad sense is referred to as a contract that is implied. It may or may not be in a written form a put on a piece of paper and signed by the contracting parties. However in such a scenario, the entire conduct of the contracting parties is expected to be based on mutual understanding and trust. Though an implicit contract has the same express value and legal jurisdiction as is the case with other explicit forms of contract and agreements, yet in many cases it becomes difficult to prove the existence of a particular part of the agreement in a contract if it is not mentioned explicitly.

Contracts could be of various forms, an employment contract, a business contract, a contract between businessmen and trade bodies, contract among interested parties who are involved in any business, partnership or any kind of deal. Since contracts are put in a written form and are legally binding for the contracting parties, usually people are very particular about what goes and what not in a contract. If something is not written explicitly in a contract while that is implicit, one of the contracting parties can go out of the loop and can create troubles for the other contractor.

Talking of an implicit contract, while the legal aspect can be questioned in most of the places and situations, there are exceptions. In one of the landmark judgments in a legal battle between Baltimore Ohio R Co vs. United States in 1923, the United States Supreme Court ruled that even implicit contracts can be legally binding. One aspect however is that the letter and spirit of the contract as part of the agreement or understanding has to be followed.

However, with commercial interests gaining prominence and agreements and contracts being written and rewritten, most of the contracting parties prefer going by the written word. They would prefer going by the written content of the contract rather than waiting for an implicit contract and depending upon the letter and spirit which could be altered by the interest party at any point of time.

Implicit contracts are though not irrelevant. They do serve an important purpose of enhancing business ethics and better professional practices. No wonder, issues like ethics and corporate governance are making a comeback. These issues have become important for contemporary business leaders and are regularly being discussed across business seminars and tables. Further, higher education in business management nowadays also teach on issues of ethics and implicit contracts and how they better and enhance understanding and promote healthy business practices. An implicit contract in spite of all its limitations continues to attract attention of economy and business watchers and more and more changes in this realm of contracts and agreements are making their way.
 
 
Compare Infobase
Site designed, developed and maintained by Compare Infobase Ltd.